Following on from the recent furore sparked by an article on a gay website that claimed “THE MANCHESTER BOMBING WAS AN ATTACK ON YOUNG WOMEN AND QUEER PEOPLE EMBRACING THEIR FREEDOM”GuysLikeU columnist Andy West, a seasoned journalist, responds to what was raised in the article and argues that the actions of Salmon Abedi were directed at western society, not just gay men and women.

Read more: Gay men react angrily at controversial article that suggests the Manchester bombing was targeted at gay men.

“It’s now almost a week since the attack inside the foyer of Manchester Arena that killed 22 people and injured many more.

I watched the news come in live and felt, as so many felt, a sense of shock and horror but also an all-too familiar feeling that we will see more bloodshed yet.

In the hours that followed, we discovered a little girl had been murdered when the nail bomb exploded at 10.30pm. Just 8-years-old. Since, we have watched as screenshots of social media thumbnails have made their way online, revealing the happy, smiling faces of the lost.

How familiar they look, even though they are strangers. They are familiar because they are us. Fathers, mothers, daughters, sons, sisters and brothers: all of them innocent people living everyday lives.
The dead reflect Salman Abedi’s intentions: to try and turn his own hollow, meagre, weak life into something significant and to strike at Western Society. He – like all terrorists – has failed in his first objective. He remains pathetic. But I worry that these attacks are affecting our society in a profound though not always obvious way.

I could have predicted that the anti-Muslim, anti-immigration league’s ranks would swell; that is inevitable. What saddened me was the response to the attack of some parts of gay society and gay media when it was revealed that one of our own, Martyn Hett, had lost his life in the explosion.

Read more: Corrie superfan Martyn Hett named as one of the Manchester victims

One gay magazine’s website quickly responded to the news, with an article titled: ‘THE MANCHESTER BOMBING WAS AN ATTACK ON YOUNG WOMEN AND QUEER PEOPLE EMBRACING THEIR FREEDOM’

This, to me, feels like a mistake, though in the reeling moments following the loss of a beloved friend and colleague, an understandable one. I was never fortunate enough to meet Martyn and I can only imagine what cold shock his friends and family must have felt when they learned that he had been killed.

In no way do I criticise their anger at Abedi and I can see absolutely why it must have felt, in that moment, that he was killed in part for his pride as a gay man.

And yet, fundamentally, that seems unlikely. In what we know, it doesn’t look like the bomber was attacking queer people. Three heterosexual men were killed that night and one teenage boy who was at the Ariana Grande concert with his girlfriend. Nine straight women lost their lives as well as eight girls.

To characterise the events of Monday night as an attack on gay people strikes a discordant note when we are still working to encourage acceptance of LGBT+ people beyond the bubble of the London media set. I’m afraid it will smack of self-indulgence and an attempted appropriation of a horror that ought to be shared by all.

It is true that Ariana Grande is a vocal supporter of gay rights, as all pop stars hoping to sell records are wise to be, but there is no evidence that Salman Abedi was seeking to kill gay men when he built his bomb and walked into the foyer of the Manchester Arena. If gay men or gay culture had been his target, wouldn’t he have gone to a gay bar or club? Wouldn’t he have waited for Pride?

No. It was an attack on Western culture; an attack on parents wanting their children to enjoy music, on girls getting an education and wearing their clothes and hair as they wish, on people being allowed to express their sexuality whatever it might be, on our acceptance of alcohol in our lives, on our capitalism, our hedonism, our freedom.

We, as members of the LGBT+ community can be thankful that our rights and freedoms are now woven tightly into that Western culture.
Today British society bears another scorch mark and yes, a beautiful, creative, clever, kind gay man will forever be a part of the scar, but so will eight girls, nine heterosexual women, one boy and three heterosexual men.

With such a long history of brutalisation – particularly at the hands of Islam and Christianity – it is easy for gay men to feel instantly as though we are under particular attack.

But this is not the time to claim ownership of the grief and anger following the sickening events in Manchester. We, as British people, must accept the pain and the anger as one, so that we can move on with strength and unity and prove that our will to maintain freedom and joy is undiminished.”

The 22 people who died in the tragic bombings are:

FullSizeRender[1]

Megan Hurley, 15, Liverpool

Elaine McIver, 43, Cheshire

Courtney Boyle, 19, Gateshead

Philip Tron, 32, Gateshead

Wendy Fawell, 50, Otley, Leeds

Eilidh MacLeod, 14, Isle of Barra

Chloe Rutherford, 17, South Shields

Liam Curry, 19, South Shields

Sorrell Leczkowski, 14, Leeds

Michelle Kiss, 45, Blackburn

Jane Tweddle-Taylor, 51, Blackpool

Nell Jones, 14, Goostrey, Cheshire

Martyn Hett, 29, Stockport

Angelika Klis, 40, PolandMarcin Klis, 42, Poland

Olivia Campbell, 15, Bury

Alison Howe, 44, Royton

Lisa Lees, 43, RoytonKelly Brewster, 32, Sheffield

Saffie Rose Roussos, 8, Tarleton, Lancs

Georgina Callander, 18, Whittle-le-Woods, Lancs

John Atkinson, 26, Radcliffe, Manchester